By David Armitage
David Armitage provides the 1st entire background of British conceptions of empire for part a century, tracing the emergence of British imperial identification from the mid-sixteenth to the mid-eighteenth centuries. This e-book sheds new gentle on significant British political thinkers, from Sir Thomas Smith to David Hume, via supplying novel bills of the "British challenge" within the early glossy interval, of the connection among Protestantism and empire, of theories of estate, liberty and political economic system in imperial standpoint, and of the imperial contribution to the emergence of the British id.
Read or Download The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (Ideas in Context) PDF
Best Political Economy books
Written in 1833-4, while Marx used to be slightly twenty-five, this astonishingly wealthy physique of works shaped the cornerstone for his later political philosophy. within the Critique of Hegel's Doctrine of the kingdom, he dissects Hegel's concept and develops his personal perspectives on civil society, whereas his Letters show a livid mind suffering to increase the egalitarian conception of nation.
The autumn of the Berlin Wall had huge, immense symbolic resonance, marking the cave in of Marxist politics and economics. certainly, Marxist regimes have failed miserably, and with them, it kind of feels, all cause to take the writings of Karl Marx heavily. Jonathan Wolff argues that if we detach Marx the critic of present society from Marx the prophet of a few never-to-be-realized people paradise, he is still the main striking critic we've of liberal, capitalist, bourgeois society.
Debates surrounding institutional swap became more and more relevant to Political technology, administration experiences, and Sociology, opposing the function of globalization in bringing a couple of convergence of nationwide economies and associations on one version to theories approximately 'Varieties of Capitalism'. This ebook brings jointly a special set of participants from a spread to ascertain present theories of institutional swap.
Why are a few international locations richer than others? Why do a little economies develop lots speedier than others do? Do economies are inclined to converge to comparable degrees of consistent with capita source of revenue? Or is catching up easily very unlikely? If glossy know-how has proven the aptitude to elevate residing criteria to first-world degrees, why is it that nearly all of the world's inhabitants lives in poverty in underdeveloped international locations?
Extra resources for The Ideological Origins of the British Empire (Ideas in Context)
In Iure Veritas: experiences in Canon legislation in reminiscence of Schafer Williams (Cincinnati, ), –; John Gillingham, ‘The English Invasion of Ireland’, in Brendan Bradshaw, Andrew Hadﬁeld and Willy Maley (eds. ), Representing eire: Literature and the Origins of Conﬂict, – (Cambridge, ), –. R. R. Davies, ‘The Failure of the 1st British Empire? England’s relatives with eire, Scotland and Wales –’, in Nigel Saul (ed. ), England in Europe – (London, ), –. James Campbell, ‘The uk of britain: The Anglo-Saxon Achievement’, in Alexander furnish and Keith J. Stringer (eds. ), Uniting the dominion? The Making of British heritage (London, ), ; evaluate John Dee, ‘HAKKASOJQASIA BQESSAMIJG’ (), BL Harl. MS , ﬀ. v–r. England, Scotland and eire c. – and Plantagenet kings in the direction of Wales, eire and Scotland. regardless of the Anglo-Saxons’ good fortune in making a uniﬁed English state among the 7th and the 11th centuries, they have been not able to take in the bordering territories of Scotland and Wales, that have been left as strength prizes for destiny rulers. The Scottish Crown equally used the language of empire to assert its independence and supremacy within the ﬁfteenth century, and for related purposes. The collision among those imperial monarchies within the mid-sixteenth century may provide upward push to the ﬁrst claims (by the English Crown) to an ‘Empire of serious Britain’, and may evoke the counterclaim, through defenders of Scottish autonomy, that to develop into a part of such an ‘empire’ might make Scotland into little greater than a ‘colony’ of britain. those appeals to imperium and coloniae, in the course of the 3 Kingdoms within the past due medieval and early-modern interval, indicated the Roman roots of British imperial ideology. From these neo-Roman origins sprang the continuity among the production of a unitary, legally-bounded, self sufficient notion of the kingdom and the later means of forming a multinational, vast empire within the Atlantic global. Empire was once continually a language of energy. In its unique Roman feel, imperium denoted the authority of a Justice of the Peace to behave on behalf of Rome and its voters, no matter if at domestic (domi), within the urban of Rome, or in another country (militiae). the folks donated imperium to their magistrates; they, in flip, acted simply in as far as they represented the folk jointly. not anyone yet a Justice of the Peace may perhaps command such authority, and such authority may perhaps in basic terms be vested in a Justice of the Peace. Imperium used to be hence officially constrained, although it was once probably limitless in its volume outdoor town itself. within the early years of the Roman Republic, the exclusivity of imperium was once bolstered via absolutely the contrast among imperium domi and imperium militiae. even though each one was once transitority, and vested in a selected agent, the latter was once much more tightly limited since it used to be even more expansive in its powers. The boundary among imperium domi and imperium militiae was once the outer restrict of town of Rome itself, no matter if deﬁned (in the earliest days) because the partitions of town or (in later years) because the furthest achieve of Roman executive.